Archive for the ‘independent filmmaker’ Category

How do I Fund my Documentary – Interlude

Thursday, September 1st, 2011

After having written about crowd funding, attending the Independent Feature Project week seminars for documentary filmmakers in September and reading anything and everything about documentary funding, outreach, sourcing, networking and ROI’s I’m a bit tired.  I think I’m going to take a nap now.  Oh right, I sold my sofa to fund the Kickstarter campaign – we needed a great video to launch.  Well, then I’ll just go to bed  - no pillows though – that was ruined on one of the late night working sessions to reach out to backers before the Kickstarter deadline expired.  It’s actually quite comfy sleeping without my pillow – I just sometimes have a hard time adjusting my eye line at the computer screen now that I carry my head at a permanent 45 degree angle because I can’t pay for the chiropractor to set my spine straight, but it it’s well worth it – I raised another $25 by pre selling a DVD of a film I have pitched so many times I recite it in my sleep and I have done so much outreach work for it that I have to pinch myself every once in a while as a reminder that the film hasn’t actually been shot yet.  Maybe I won’t nap after all. Sound familiar? Welcome to my world. 

But how DO I FUND MY DOC?  Find a sugar daddy.  If that’s against your morals or you are too old for a savory sugar daddy, find some other outlet for your passion and creativity. I highly recommend blogging – cheap, fast, instant gratification, no help needed.

The above mentioned Independent Feature Week of seminars had two days of seminars geared towards independent documentary filmmakers.  One of the seminars was titled How to Fund your Documentary. IndieWIRE’s Sophia Savage wrote a nice recap on the seminar. The recap is worth the read – the seminar itself was not so inspiring (I guess that’s when I found a Wiki entry called “death by Power Point” – need I say more).

Both days I heard a lot about pitching and three projects were pitched in front of an audience.  Nothing new – just the good old points rehashed yet again:  your doc should (must!) have an untold, character driven story.  You need to have unique access or position to tell that story and you need a certain urgency to sell.  Add a dash of salt et voila!

But as my friend Aideen would say: we’re excellent at what we do but we are not geniuses.  And at my tender age I must confess – I know she’s right.  If I had a genius I would imagine that by now it would have stuck out its head and asked for a drink.  So where do I go without the genius in my back pocket?  Work twice as hard or get a day job (yuck!).

The question of course is never answered: how do to fund your (that is my) documentary? I’d love for one of the panelists to look me in the eye and say: Nina, go to so-and-so and they’ll fund your film soup to nuts (or was it soup to desert?).  Now, that would be a nice ROI for the $140 I paid for the seminars. 

As Wendy Levy from Tomorrow Partners said:  we have to be interactivists not just filmmakers.   Amen.

9 Women Can’t Make a Baby in a Month

Thursday, March 31st, 2011

Techcrunch had this very poignant post yesterday and I had to steal the title.   The jest of it is that sometimes too much money is no good.  Or that even with all the resources in the world nine women cannot produce a baby in one month – but sometimes it sure feels like we try.

So, even if you DO have your entire budget in the piggy bank, put it into a interest bearing CD and allow yourself to sit on your idea. Of course nobody in the independent film world has their piggy bank stocked.  As you scramble for your budget for the next film remember that the universe is giving you ample time to gestate your next, perfect project. Voila.

2011

Sunday, January 9th, 2011

Happy New Year to all of you.  May it be a happy, healthy and prosperous 2011.  Thank you for reading my blog which you can also find on: www.ninafroriep.blogspot.com with occasional non-Abraham’s-Children-related comments.

Not screening in a Theatre? No problem…

Friday, May 28th, 2010

We are at a stage in the distribution of Abraham’s Children were we hold grass-roots semi-theatrical screenings.   What that means is we go to non-traditional venues, like school auditoriums and class rooms, mosques, meeting halls and living rooms to show the film.   Last weekend I had the good fortune to show Abraham’s Children twice myself.  Once at a high school auditorium and once in a 1-12K private school whose auditorium also functions as a prayer room.

Early on, Caitlin Boyle of Film Sprout had warned a bunch of us filmmakers at her (awesome) workshop on grass roots distribution outreach for social change documentaries, to let go of having the film screened in a ‘perfect’ setting.   I took that to mean, that the film might be shown in 4:3 format rather than the intended 16:9 (widescreen) or that the sound was not going to be perfect, etc.  I also assumed that I would not be there to have to witness it.

SO: on Friday and Saturday I made sure we had it all set up perfectly – right aspect ratio, sound as balanced as possible with the sound system available, room darkened, temperature right, etc.    Friday:  perfect!  Saturday? Not so.   For reasons beyond my control it was decided stop the film after it was only about 80% done.  Whaat?

Reason being, they had simply run out of time and needed the room for something else.   I was dumb folded.  Why invite me to attend?  Why go through the trouble of holding a screening of a film whose length is known?  Why schedule a speech and Q&A session with the director?  The Q&A turned into a discussion in the hallway with a few interested parties and I was back at my car before I knew it.   It was a bizarre experience and something tells me: not the last.

Moral of the story: you can only control so much and then you have to let go.  You where right, Caitlin (and Mom). 

All I can say: donate $50, get the DVD shipped to your home and FINISH watching it!

What we share and what we don’t

Monday, May 10th, 2010

A few months back I read this article in the New York Times science section by John Tierney and marked it because I thought it very interesting.  When the topic of viral video distribution came up in our Think Tank “Quo F Vadis” that my friend Wilder and I started, about the future of the film industry on the internet, I had to go back and dig it out.     

When it comes to newspaper articles, it seems that the ‘awesome’ factor out ways the ‘cool’ factor and that the stronger the emotions the more the article will be shared – interestingly enough in the newspaper world longer articles did better than shorter ones and I think with visual content we see the reverse.   “Short, shorter, shortest” is the recipe for a viral hit.   

I think where an article might have an advantage over a video is that it’s “scan-able”; a video is a linear affair.   I also think that a forwarded article has a notion of “look how cool AND smart I am by forwarding you this awesome intellectual article about optics of deer vision” (no kidding – read the article).   Whereas a video sub-text would be “look how hip and cool I am” OR “how outraged I am by this injustice”.   No wonder Mashable has near daily list of top  YouTube hits.  This Sunday: 10 best wedding dance videos. Tomorrow: (educated guess) 10 funniest dog tricks. 

Where does that leave us, content providers?   Are we all decimated to 2 minute one-offs or webisodes? How will long format content be consumed in the future?  Who will pay for it;  consumers, aggregators, advertisers?  

Have you watched yourself lately watch content on line?   How long is tour attention span, when do you decide to commit or skip to the next video or task?  What are you willing to pay for and what do you expect to be free?   

Tell me…

 

What is your message?

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

“When does the wisdom of crowds give way to the meanness of mobs?”  (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/12/science/12tier.html).  

Interesting article, but really what caught my eye was the first sentence.   As I spend quite a bit of time with social networks, updating the Abraham’s Children website and blogging I sometimes feel like I’m losing sight of what I should do. 

What should I do?  These days, it’s getting a film out into the world.

Am I relying on the wisdom of crowds, or am I delivering myself to the madness of crowds? And where does “madness” start?

I’m building a brand and getting a message out – does that scream cliché or what?  It would be easiest so say: “watch my film, its awesome”.    That’s like Pepsi saying “drink Pepsi, its good”.  That’s not a brand, not a message, not a life style, nothing exciting and why should you bother?  There are millions of films out there and roughly 6,000 documentaries alone are produced in the US alone each year.   Gotta do better than that.   

What I learned in the last few months is nothing new but I never had a chance to put it into action with ONE PRODUCT (or service) in hand.   Having only one product, my film, I had no choice but to concentrate on IT – obviously.

My first instinct was to create more product.  As making another film is not practical I started thinking about merchandising.   How do you merchandise a documentary about Muslim children?  How do I pay for that?  What is the risk of money spent upfront versus potential income?  It didn’t seem worth the risk, so I ditched that idea.

Long story and many detours later I (re)-learned this:  Focus:  one message, one goal, one product.  If you manage to get that one message over right; minds open, opportunities arise and people HEAR you.  Once you’re there – you can go back (gingerly) to being your enthusiastic supporter of your own film with ideas to boot.    

Once you have your message and your product all primped and ready – then you can unleash the crowds – because now you know where you are going and what your vehicle is.  You still will possibly lose yourself in one mad crowd or the other – be it virtual, real or imagined.  But at least your message is always the same and your product has integrity.

With your message straight you also have a better gauge when you are being taken over by the crowd(s).  How many hours are you spending on Twitter, Facebook and your blog, when you could be making very targeted phone calls?  

Run a test by announcing something that requires feedback, a sign up, anything where your ‘crowds’ need to act.  Do they act?  That only works if your message is on target.   Otherwise your contaminating your social media ’trials’.  

So, either you change your message to fit your crowd or you change your crowd to fit your message…  and sometimes you just bang your head against the wall – I did.

What is your message?   What is your goal?  What is the integrity of your product?

For Abraham’s Children?
→  Abraham’s Children bridges the gap between the Muslim world and the West.
→  Our goal is to get Abraham’s Children into as many classrooms as possible in America.
→  Abraham’s Children is beautifully produced, wholesome and its modular set up is ideal for a learning environment.

When you know too much

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Innocence IS bliss.  But I knew that already, we all do.   Starting a business or a family, shooting a film, or getting involved with that community board: the “had I known” realization.   But what about the second time around?  What do we hope to do better, different, more efficient, or with more compassion?  Or is the first time so daunting that we decide: never again.

I remember my dear brilliant friend in Ireland who is also a filmmaker ask me if I was ready to spend the next two years of my life with my (first) documentary and I bravely said ‘yes’.   The conversation in my head was a bit different.   That was more along the lines of “yes, BUT…. won’t be full time, have clients, won’t take that long, etc.”

HA!  Had I known! But now I DO KNOW.  What does that mean for the next project?  NEXT PROJECT?  Are you kidding me?  You’re still knee-deep in this one.   Yeah, but this is a chance to get it right this time.  Set it up differently from the get go, make sure you align yourself even better with people who do what you don’t do well brilliantly, allocate the budget differently and most of all: PATIENCE.   Where does that leave the gut feeling and instincts though?  To me, those two are paramount. 

So here I am, trying to figure out not only a new awesome topic, angle and story, and something to be passionate about, BUT something where I can align myself NOW with the right people, groups, organizations and causes for three years from now when the film is done.   Yikes.   But you know me, I have some stuff cooking – I’m just afraid to serve it – pardon the metaphor – the ramifications are now clear beyond finishing the film – that was the easy part, remember.   I also have to make sure to get the film OUT into the world.  Will the second time be easier, or will it be harder? We shall find out.

The Conversation

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

Yesterday the Conversation happened.   That is, THE CONVERSATION on Social Media, Digital Distribution and the Future of Film (Tweet: #convoNYC) at Columbia University in Manhattan.  

Organizers, Scott Kirsner (who wrote one of my all time favorite books:  Fans, Friends and Followers), Tiffany Shlain and Lance Weiler and www.workbookproject.com) put together a full day of panels and beak out meetings that kept me focused for 9 hours straight.   Really good stuff if you are an independent filmmaker and especially if you are in DIY distro mode with a documentary.

We are at a cross roads of our industry, not only as independent filmmakers but also as producers and conent-providers at large.   The web, new technology and new ways of interaction with content of any kind, audience participation, instant access  paired with very limited time resources are completely, totally and irrevocably changing how we consume media, how we engage in politics, social lives and just pretty much everything else.   The generational divide of participants and non-participants is bigger than ever and has little to do with age, and everything to do with willingness to engage and sadly for many with insufficient access to computers and the internet.

There were so many things yesterday that were of micro interest to an independent filmmaker, but the bigger picture was ever present in the back (and the front) of the room.  My head is still spinning with all the awesome possibilities that not necessarily cost much in terms of technology or bells and whistles, but do tend to take a huge amount of engagement, sic. time, sic. labor and sic. cost.

After all that, my two favorites take-aways from the day had nothing to do with being at the cutting edge in terms of knowledge or technical savvy, but just two quotes that would have been equally as pertinent 20 years ago, but do take a whole new meaning in today’s environment.

The first, attributed to one of the organizers of this amazing event, Tiffany Shlane – more precisely her father:  “If you’re not living on the edge you’re taking up too much space.”   And the other, uttered as a throw away sentence summing up the panel he participated in by Richard Lorber: “Everything is possible and nothing is working”.     Imight ad a resounding “YET” to the last quote.   On on we plod….

Fiscal Sponsorship

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

We are proud to announce that Abraham’s Children is now fiscally sponsored by the IFP (www.ifp.org), a not-for profit organization that supports independent filmmakers.   If you wish for your contribution to be tax deductible please contact us directly at:  212-343-3099 or nina@clockwiseprodutions.com.    For information on why we are raising funds and how to donate with credit card, go to our “donate” page.  Thank you.

 

Film Festivals

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

I really, really have not wanted to write this post, but it’s time.

As I think you all know by now – I’m new to film and documentary distribution game. Making the film – which at first I thought would be the challenge, was actually the easy part. Distribution is the challenge – I spare you the unprintable thoughts I have about it.

So: what I really want to say is this: film festivals suck. So, there, I said it. Oh, no – any chances of getting into one: down the drain… Actually I should say: film festival submissions suck.  If festivals actually suck I don’t know because I’ve never been at one (not as filmmaker at leat). Envious? Definitely!

The real question here of course is: “what is wrong with Abraham’s Children“? And from my ever so slightly slanted point of view I would say: “absolutely NOTHING”. My theory, why a timely, beautifully produced film with awesome talent does not get into Film Festivals is: no sex, drugs and rock’n roll. Not a sliver of it.

Abraham’s Children is littered with fun, well spoken and behaving children that happen to be Americans and happen to be Muslim. Gosh: no terrorist, not even alcohol, teen pregnancy, drugs – just normal kids. It’s a bore, I know.

But if you watch the film you might actually learn something about Islam you didn’t know (unless of course you’re Muslim, but then you’re just checking out the competition),  and you will definitely fall in love with one of the kids if not all of them, you will laugh and you will maybe even see some of yourself in one of them and be amazed at the diversity these kids bring to the screen. So give it a try.

Support the film, buy the DVD, and tell your friends on FB, Twitter and all other social networks I’m oblivious to, about it. Host a screening and get the word out that there is this little film that shows a slice of live of Muslims in America from a normal, every-day perspective. Can you do that?